| View previous topic :: View next topic | | Author | Message |
|---|
Folkert Rienstra
Guest
|  Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:42 pm Post subject: Re: I need to upgrade an Abit KT7 hard disk. |
| "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4ndpomFa0u38U1@individual.net
| Quote: | Folkert Rienstra <see_reply-to@myweb.nl> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Folkert Rienstra <see_reply-to@myweb.nl> wrote
MalcolmO <user@domain.invalid> wrote
XP will be fine with new drive, though 48-bit
LBA disks need to be enabled in the registry.
Nope, that's 2K.
Nonsense.
http://www.48bitlba.com/win2Khb.htm suggests that Rod has it right.
Depends on how you read his original.
Nope.
Yup.
Nope.
It was true for the original edition of XP
Nope.
Yup, Q303013.
Pity that clearly says
This article describes the Microsoft Windows XP Service
Pack 1 (SP1) 48-bit Logical Block Addressing (LBA) support
Note Windows XP does not support 48-bit LBA support unless
you are running Windows XP SP1. If you want to use 48-bit LBA
support, you must apply Windows XP SP1 or later.
Try again, fuckwit.
|
Nice posturing, Roddles.
You must be getting a bit desperate if you need two attempts to discredit me.
Unfortunately those with more than your 2 braincells can read beyond that and see
how the article goes on describing editing the registry to enable 48-bit support
even though it also says that SP1 ignores these settings. So obviously this is for
original XP. Unfortunately it seems to say that if you finally have 48-bit support
working and actually address space above 137GB it will fuck up. I say "seems" as it
may well be the same problem that even some SP1 deliveries still have and is warned
for, see below.
You may actually be okay if you don't do "entering standby or hibernation or
writing a memory dump".
They just don't tell, all that they say is that "Data corruption *may* occur".
The article also speaks of checking for the correct version of ATAPI.SYS so
anyone with more than your 2 braincells can work out that that is where the
working 48-bit support is. And waddayaknow, that is available as a hotfix.
| Quote: |
None of the rest of your desperate attempts to bullshit your
way out of your predicament worth bothering with, as always. |
|
| | Back to top | |  | Rod Speed
Guest
| | Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:10 pm Post subject: Re: I need to upgrade an Abit KT7 hard disk. |
| Folkert Rienstra <see_reply-to@myweb.nl> wrote
| Quote: | Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Folkert Rienstra <see_reply-to@myweb.nl> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Folkert Rienstra <see_reply-to@myweb.nl> wrote
MalcolmO <user@domain.invalid> wrote
XP will be fine with new drive, though 48-bit
LBA disks need to be enabled in the registry.
Nope, that's 2K.
Nonsense.
http://www.48bitlba.com/win2Khb.htm suggests that Rod has it right.
Depends on how you read his original.
Nope.
Yup.
Nope.
It was true for the original edition of XP
Nope.
Yup, Q303013.
Pity that clearly says
This article describes the Microsoft Windows XP Service
Pack 1 (SP1) 48-bit Logical Block Addressing (LBA) support
Note Windows XP does not support 48-bit LBA support unless
you are running Windows XP SP1. If you want to use 48-bit LBA
support, you must apply Windows XP SP1 or later.
Try again, fuckwit.
|
<reams of your pathetic excuse for bullshit flushed where it belongs>
| Quote: | the article goes on describing editing the registry to enable 48-bit
support even though it also says that SP1 ignores these settings.
So obviously this is for original XP. Unfortunately it seems to say
that if you finally have 48-bit support working and actually address
space above 137GB it will fuck up. I say "seems" as it may well be
the same problem that even some SP1 deliveries still have and is
warned for, see below.
|
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
| Quote: | You may actually be okay if you don't do "entering
standby or hibernation or writing a memory dump".
They just don't tell, all that they say is that "Data corruption
*may* occur".
|
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
| Quote: | The article also speaks of checking for the correct version
of ATAPI.SYS so anyone with more than your 2 braincells
can work out that that is where the working 48-bit support
is. And waddayaknow, that is available as a hotfix.
|
ALL SPs include earlier hotfixes, fuckwit.
Says nothing useful what so ever about your stupid pig ignorant
claim that the original XP has 48 bit LBA support JUST by enabling
it in the registry, as you originally pig ignorantly claimed.
| Quote: | None of the rest of your desperate attempts to bullshit your
way out of your predicament worth bothering with, as always. |
|
| | Back to top | | | 0_Qed
Guest
| | Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:01 pm Post subject: Re: I need to upgrade an Abit KT7 hard disk. |
| Rod Speed wrote:
| Quote: | Folkert Rienstra <see_reply-to@myweb.nl> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Folkert Rienstra <see_reply-to@myweb.nl> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Folkert Rienstra <see_reply-to@myweb.nl> wrote
MalcolmO <user@domain.invalid> wrote
|
Who's sewer overflowed ????
=Not= mine !!!
Qed.
| Quote: | XP will be fine with new drive, though 48-bit
LBA disks need to be enabled in the registry.
Nope, that's 2K.
Nonsense.
http://www.48bitlba.com/win2Khb.htm suggests that Rod has it right.
Depends on how you read his original.
Nope.
Yup.
Nope.
It was true for the original edition of XP
Nope.
Yup, Q303013.
Pity that clearly says
This article describes the Microsoft Windows XP Service
Pack 1 (SP1) 48-bit Logical Block Addressing (LBA) support
Note Windows XP does not support 48-bit LBA support unless
you are running Windows XP SP1. If you want to use 48-bit LBA
support, you must apply Windows XP SP1 or later.
Try again, fuckwit.
reams of your pathetic excuse for bullshit flushed where it belongs
the article goes on describing editing the registry to enable 48-bit
support even though it also says that SP1 ignores these settings.
So obviously this is for original XP. Unfortunately it seems to say
that if you finally have 48-bit support working and actually address
space above 137GB it will fuck up. I say "seems" as it may well be
the same problem that even some SP1 deliveries still have and is
warned for, see below.
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
You may actually be okay if you don't do "entering
standby or hibernation or writing a memory dump".
They just don't tell, all that they say is that "Data corruption
*may* occur".
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
The article also speaks of checking for the correct version
of ATAPI.SYS so anyone with more than your 2 braincells
can work out that that is where the working 48-bit support
is. And waddayaknow, that is available as a hotfix.
ALL SPs include earlier hotfixes, fuckwit.
Says nothing useful what so ever about your stupid pig ignorant
claim that the original XP has 48 bit LBA support JUST by enabling
it in the registry, as you originally pig ignorantly claimed.
None of the rest of your desperate attempts to bullshit your
way out of your predicament worth bothering with, as always. |
|
| | Back to top | | | |
|
