| View previous topic :: View next topic | | Author | Message |
|---|
Pete Rynas Guest
| Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:42 pm Post subject: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| | i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? |
| | Back to top | |  | Brian Campbell Guest
| Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:42 pm Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| Did you install the latest via 4 in 1 (hyperion) drivers? Pete Rynas (r566b@comcast.net) wrote: : i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? |
| | Back to top | |  | tcsenter Guest
| Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:30 am Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| Pete Rynas wrote:
| Quote: | i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else???
|
I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and the other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I tried and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked perfectly in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. Regards, Tim |
| | Back to top | |  | Pete Rynas Guest
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:05 am Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| yes i did the 4 in 1 drivers, and i have tried different memory , video cards etc , still kind of flakey--the dang bios was 2004!!! flashed to the latest of course, still weird stuff - doesn't seem to like some 512 mem and the mem slots are very hard compared to most--tempted to return but i am still whacking away at it thanks alot pete "tcsenter" <tcsenter@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1163057403.416466.230930@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Pete Rynas wrote: i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and the other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I tried and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked perfectly in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. Regards, Tim
|
|
| | Back to top | |  | Pete Rynas Guest
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:23 pm Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| seems to be working alright now , i quess thier always like this, but still wondering if running a SATA drive in the ide mode (no other sata connected so nothing to raid to?) at 150/m/sec is better/faster than an ide?? thank you pete "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message news:qsGdnVFPobYDlcnYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
| Quote: | yes i did the 4 in 1 drivers, and i have tried different memory , video cards etc , still kind of flakey--the dang bios was 2004!!! flashed to the latest of course, still weird stuff - doesn't seem to like some 512 mem and the mem slots are very hard compared to most--tempted to return but i am still whacking away at it thanks alot pete "tcsenter" <tcsenter@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1163057403.416466.230930@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... Pete Rynas wrote: i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and the other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I tried and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked perfectly in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. Regards, Tim
|
|
| | Back to top | |  | Pete Rynas Guest
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:16 pm Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| still get an occasioal blue screen , i think that it is the 512 mem moduales? different brands??? any ideas "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message news:e9CdnUUSsc45TMnYnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com...
| Quote: | seems to be working alright now , i quess thier always like this, but still wondering if running a SATA drive in the ide mode (no other sata connected so nothing to raid to?) at 150/m/sec is better/faster than an ide?? thank you pete "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message news:qsGdnVFPobYDlcnYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com... yes i did the 4 in 1 drivers, and i have tried different memory , video cards etc , still kind of flakey--the dang bios was 2004!!! flashed to the latest of course, still weird stuff - doesn't seem to like some 512 mem and the mem slots are very hard compared to most--tempted to return but i am still whacking away at it thanks alot pete "tcsenter" <tcsenter@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1163057403.416466.230930@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... Pete Rynas wrote: i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and the other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I tried and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked perfectly in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. Regards, Tim
|
|
| | Back to top | |  | Kyle Guest
| Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:57 am Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| memtest86, get a copy, test your system, www.memtest86.com -- Best regards, Kyle "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message news:qamdnZBs5bVHYcXYnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@comcast.com... | still get an occasioal blue screen , i think that it is the 512 mem | moduales? different brands??? any ideas | "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message | news:e9CdnUUSsc45TMnYnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com... | > seems to be working alright now , i quess thier always like this, but | > still wondering if running a SATA drive in the ide mode (no other sata | > connected so nothing to raid to?) at 150/m/sec is better/faster than an | > ide?? thank you pete | > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message | > news:qsGdnVFPobYDlcnYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com... | >> yes i did the 4 in 1 drivers, and i have tried different memory , video | >> cards etc , still kind of flakey--the dang bios was 2004!!! flashed to | >> the latest of course, still weird stuff - doesn't seem to like some 512 | >> mem and the mem slots are very hard compared to most--tempted to return | >> but i am still whacking away at it thanks alot pete | >> "tcsenter" <tcsenter@yahoo.com> wrote in message | >> news:1163057403.416466.230930@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... | >>> Pete Rynas wrote: | >>>> i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? | >>> | >>> | >>> I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and the | >>> other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I tried | >>> and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked perfectly | >>> in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB | >>> modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. | >>> | >>> Regards, | >>> | >>> Tim | >>> | >> | >> | > | > | | |
| | Back to top | |  | Pete Rynas Guest
| Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:16 pm Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| will try the mem test - running now , don't know if i will be able to figure out the results - using the bootable floppy version from the web site address you gave, also noticed that after 36 hrs yesterday the machine would not wake up ? thanks , i will keep you posted pete BTW do you have a PT800CE??? i am running a p4 3 gig w/generic 256 meg radeon sata 160 stand alone sata "Kyle" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:FoKdnSZiBom7McfYnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@comcast.com...
| Quote: | memtest86, get a copy, test your system, www.memtest86.com -- Best regards, Kyle "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message news:qamdnZBs5bVHYcXYnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@comcast.com... | still get an occasioal blue screen , i think that it is the 512 mem | moduales? different brands??? any ideas | "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message | news:e9CdnUUSsc45TMnYnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com... | > seems to be working alright now , i quess thier always like this, but | > still wondering if running a SATA drive in the ide mode (no other sata | > connected so nothing to raid to?) at 150/m/sec is better/faster than an | > ide?? thank you pete | > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message | > news:qsGdnVFPobYDlcnYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com... | >> yes i did the 4 in 1 drivers, and i have tried different memory , video | >> cards etc , still kind of flakey--the dang bios was 2004!!! flashed to | >> the latest of course, still weird stuff - doesn't seem to like some 512 | >> mem and the mem slots are very hard compared to most--tempted to return | >> but i am still whacking away at it thanks alot pete | >> "tcsenter" <tcsenter@yahoo.com> wrote in message | >> news:1163057403.416466.230930@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... | >>> Pete Rynas wrote: | >>>> i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? | | | >>> I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and the | >>> other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I tried | >>> and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked perfectly | >>> in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB | >>> modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. | | >>> Regards, | | >>> Tim | | | | | | |
|
|
| | Back to top | |  | Brian Campbell Guest
| Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:45 pm Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| You get any errors from memtest and it is severe. Tweak the memory settings in the bios, and run memtest until the errors are gone. Use one stick first, remove it, then try the other. try each memory slot. Via chipset are actually very memory tolerant, but some motherboard just do not like some memory combinations, while others have no problems. Pete Rynas (r566b@comcast.net) wrote: : has found 40 errors in 5 tests? will remove the 512 kingston value ram and : run again , i believe the other 512 is an older Apacer module - looks like : at least one bad ( but in my older machine ecs intel chipset ICH5 no prolems : but never bothered to check the mem). looks as if this VIA chipset is just : too picky on the memory??? wish i knew how severe this errors really are?? : thank you for any additional info pete : "Kyle" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message : news:FoKdnSZiBom7McfYnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@comcast.com... : > memtest86, get a copy, test your system, www.memtest86.com : > : > : > -- : > Best regards, : > Kyle : > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message : > news:qamdnZBs5bVHYcXYnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@comcast.com... : > | still get an occasioal blue screen , i think that it is the 512 mem : > | moduales? different brands??? any ideas : > | "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message : > | news:e9CdnUUSsc45TMnYnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com... : > | > seems to be working alright now , i quess thier always like this, : > but : > | > still wondering if running a SATA drive in the ide mode (no other : > sata : > | > connected so nothing to raid to?) at 150/m/sec is better/faster : > than an : > | > ide?? thank you pete : > | > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message : > | > news:qsGdnVFPobYDlcnYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com... : > | >> yes i did the 4 in 1 drivers, and i have tried different memory , : > video : > | >> cards etc , still kind of flakey--the dang bios was 2004!!! : > flashed to : > | >> the latest of course, still weird stuff - doesn't seem to like : > some 512 : > | >> mem and the mem slots are very hard compared to most--tempted to : > return : > | >> but i am still whacking away at it thanks alot pete : > | >> "tcsenter" <tcsenter@yahoo.com> wrote in message : > | >> news:1163057403.416466.230930@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... : > | >>> Pete Rynas wrote: : > | >>>> i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? : > | >>> : > | >>> : > | >>> I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and : > the : > | >>> other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I : > tried : > | >>> and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked : > perfectly : > | >>> in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB : > | >>> modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. : > | >>> : > | >>> Regards, : > | >>> : > | >>> Tim : > | >>> : > | >> : > | >> : > | > : > | > : > | : > | : > |
| | Back to top | |  | Pete Rynas Guest
| Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:15 am Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| has found 40 errors in 5 tests? will remove the 512 kingston value ram and run again , i believe the other 512 is an older Apacer module - looks like at least one bad ( but in my older machine ecs intel chipset ICH5 no prolems but never bothered to check the mem). looks as if this VIA chipset is just too picky on the memory??? wish i knew how severe this errors really are?? thank you for any additional info pete "Kyle" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:FoKdnSZiBom7McfYnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@comcast.com...
| Quote: | memtest86, get a copy, test your system, www.memtest86.com -- Best regards, Kyle "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message news:qamdnZBs5bVHYcXYnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@comcast.com... | still get an occasioal blue screen , i think that it is the 512 mem | moduales? different brands??? any ideas | "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message | news:e9CdnUUSsc45TMnYnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com... | > seems to be working alright now , i quess thier always like this, but | > still wondering if running a SATA drive in the ide mode (no other sata | > connected so nothing to raid to?) at 150/m/sec is better/faster than an | > ide?? thank you pete | > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message | > news:qsGdnVFPobYDlcnYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com... | >> yes i did the 4 in 1 drivers, and i have tried different memory , video | >> cards etc , still kind of flakey--the dang bios was 2004!!! flashed to | >> the latest of course, still weird stuff - doesn't seem to like some 512 | >> mem and the mem slots are very hard compared to most--tempted to return | >> but i am still whacking away at it thanks alot pete | >> "tcsenter" <tcsenter@yahoo.com> wrote in message | >> news:1163057403.416466.230930@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... | >>> Pete Rynas wrote: | >>>> i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? | | | >>> I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and the | >>> other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I tried | >>> and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked perfectly | >>> in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB | >>> modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. | | >>> Regards, | | >>> Tim | | | | | | |
|
|
| | Back to top | |  | Kyle Guest
| Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:30 am Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| Any error is severe, a chance for corruption of many things, including files on your HD. You might try using more relaxed memory settings to see if that resolves the errors, or use "SPD" for memory settings or "auto" if such a setting is found. I'm an AMD guy, nothing but Athlon CPUs here, oh, and an old PII 400 Mhz Pentium that is collecting cobwebs right now. -- Best regards, Kyle "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message news:fPOdnSoJ0LxYeMbYnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@comcast.com... | has found 40 errors in 5 tests? will remove the 512 kingston value ram and | run again , i believe the other 512 is an older Apacer module - looks like | at least one bad ( but in my older machine ecs intel chipset ICH5 no prolems | but never bothered to check the mem). looks as if this VIA chipset is just | too picky on the memory??? wish i knew how severe this errors really are?? | thank you for any additional info pete | "Kyle" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message | news:FoKdnSZiBom7McfYnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@comcast.com... | > memtest86, get a copy, test your system, www.memtest86.com | > | > | > -- | > Best regards, | > Kyle | > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message | > news:qamdnZBs5bVHYcXYnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@comcast.com... | > | still get an occasioal blue screen , i think that it is the 512 mem | > | moduales? different brands??? any ideas | > | "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message | > | news:e9CdnUUSsc45TMnYnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com... | > | > seems to be working alright now , i quess thier always like this, | > but | > | > still wondering if running a SATA drive in the ide mode (no other | > sata | > | > connected so nothing to raid to?) at 150/m/sec is better/faster | > than an | > | > ide?? thank you pete | > | > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message | > | > news:qsGdnVFPobYDlcnYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com... | > | >> yes i did the 4 in 1 drivers, and i have tried different memory , | > video | > | >> cards etc , still kind of flakey--the dang bios was 2004!!! | > flashed to | > | >> the latest of course, still weird stuff - doesn't seem to like | > some 512 | > | >> mem and the mem slots are very hard compared to most--tempted to | > return | > | >> but i am still whacking away at it thanks alot pete | > | >> "tcsenter" <tcsenter@yahoo.com> wrote in message | > | >> news:1163057403.416466.230930@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... | > | >>> Pete Rynas wrote: | > | >>>> i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? | > | >>> | > | >>> | > | >>> I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and | > the | > | >>> other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I | > tried | > | >>> and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked | > perfectly | > | >>> in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB | > | >>> modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. | > | >>> | > | >>> Regards, | > | >>> | > | >>> Tim | > | >>> | > | >> | > | >> | > | > | > | > | > | | > | | > | | |
| | Back to top | |  | Pete Rynas Guest
| Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:53 pm Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| thanks for the help!! after 6 hrs of the test on both sticks, i had 120 errors. am running one stick now and will see what happens, all bios settings are auto by spd. did you see my earlier post about the speed/advantage of a single sata drive running in the ide mode vrs. a plain old ide?? thanks again pete "Brian Campbell" <aa356@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in message news:ejh8f0$avo$1@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca...
| Quote: | You get any errors from memtest and it is severe. Tweak the memory settings in the bios, and run memtest until the errors are gone. Use one stick first, remove it, then try the other. try each memory slot. Via chipset are actually very memory tolerant, but some motherboard just do not like some memory combinations, while others have no problems. Pete Rynas (r566b@comcast.net) wrote: : has found 40 errors in 5 tests? will remove the 512 kingston value ram and : run again , i believe the other 512 is an older Apacer module - looks like : at least one bad ( but in my older machine ecs intel chipset ICH5 no prolems : but never bothered to check the mem). looks as if this VIA chipset is just : too picky on the memory??? wish i knew how severe this errors really are?? : thank you for any additional info pete : "Kyle" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message : news:FoKdnSZiBom7McfYnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@comcast.com... : > memtest86, get a copy, test your system, www.memtest86.com : : : > -- : > Best regards, : > Kyle : > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message : > news:qamdnZBs5bVHYcXYnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@comcast.com... : > | still get an occasioal blue screen , i think that it is the 512 mem : > | moduales? different brands??? any ideas : > | "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message : > | news:e9CdnUUSsc45TMnYnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com... : > | > seems to be working alright now , i quess thier always like this, : > but : > | > still wondering if running a SATA drive in the ide mode (no other : > sata : > | > connected so nothing to raid to?) at 150/m/sec is better/faster : > than an : > | > ide?? thank you pete : > | > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message : > | > news:qsGdnVFPobYDlcnYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com... : > | >> yes i did the 4 in 1 drivers, and i have tried different memory , : > video : > | >> cards etc , still kind of flakey--the dang bios was 2004!!! : > flashed to : > | >> the latest of course, still weird stuff - doesn't seem to like : > some 512 : > | >> mem and the mem slots are very hard compared to most--tempted to : > return : > | >> but i am still whacking away at it thanks alot pete : > | >> "tcsenter" <tcsenter@yahoo.com> wrote in message : > | >> news:1163057403.416466.230930@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... : > | >>> Pete Rynas wrote: : > | >>>> i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? : > | : > | : > | >>> I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and : > the : > | >>> other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I : > tried : > | >>> and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked : > perfectly : > | >>> in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB : > | >>> modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. : > | : > | >>> Regards, : > | : > | >>> Tim : > | : > | : > | : > | : > | : > | : > | :
|
|
| | Back to top | |  | Brian Campbell Guest
| Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:45 am Post subject: Re: PT800CE is Junk?????????????????? |
| No. But in the general scheme of things, it does not make mucvh difference if you go IDE or SATA. Benchmarks say the SATA drives are a little faster, but in the real world, there is no noticable difference. IDE drives are more mature and cheaper, so that is why I still use them. I am sure with enough tweaking, you will get a stable memory combination. I had a memory stick that would work on nothing, was close to trashing it. I put it in a via chipset, and tweaked the bios settings for the most stable. It works. Moral of the story is rarely is they bad memory, just incompatable memory. Pete Rynas (r566b@comcast.net) wrote: : thanks for the help!! after 6 hrs of the test on both sticks, i had 120 : errors. am running one stick now and will see what happens, all bios : settings are auto by spd. did you see my earlier post about the : speed/advantage of a single sata drive running in the ide mode vrs. a plain : old ide?? thanks again pete : "Brian Campbell" <aa356@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in message : news:ejh8f0$avo$1@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca... : > You get any errors from memtest and it is severe. Tweak the memory : > settings in the bios, and run memtest until the errors are gone. Use one : > stick first, remove it, then try the other. try each memory slot. Via : > chipset are actually very memory tolerant, but some motherboard just do : > not like some memory combinations, while others have no problems. : > : > Pete Rynas (r566b@comcast.net) wrote: : > : has found 40 errors in 5 tests? will remove the 512 kingston value ram : > and : > : run again , i believe the other 512 is an older Apacer module - looks : > like : > : at least one bad ( but in my older machine ecs intel chipset ICH5 no : > prolems : > : but never bothered to check the mem). looks as if this VIA chipset is : > just : > : too picky on the memory??? wish i knew how severe this errors really : > are?? : > : thank you for any additional info pete : > : "Kyle" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message : > : news:FoKdnSZiBom7McfYnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@comcast.com... : > : > memtest86, get a copy, test your system, www.memtest86.com : > : > : > : > : > : > -- : > : > Best regards, : > : > Kyle : > : > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message : > : > news:qamdnZBs5bVHYcXYnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@comcast.com... : > : > | still get an occasioal blue screen , i think that it is the 512 mem : > : > | moduales? different brands??? any ideas : > : > | "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message : > : > | news:e9CdnUUSsc45TMnYnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com... : > : > | > seems to be working alright now , i quess thier always like this, : > : > but : > : > | > still wondering if running a SATA drive in the ide mode (no other : > : > sata : > : > | > connected so nothing to raid to?) at 150/m/sec is better/faster : > : > than an : > : > | > ide?? thank you pete : > : > | > "Pete Rynas" <r566b@comcast.net> wrote in message : > : > | > news:qsGdnVFPobYDlcnYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com... : > : > | >> yes i did the 4 in 1 drivers, and i have tried different memory , : > : > video : > : > | >> cards etc , still kind of flakey--the dang bios was 2004!!! : > : > flashed to : > : > | >> the latest of course, still weird stuff - doesn't seem to like : > : > some 512 : > : > | >> mem and the mem slots are very hard compared to most--tempted to : > : > return : > : > | >> but i am still whacking away at it thanks alot pete : > : > | >> "tcsenter" <tcsenter@yahoo.com> wrote in message : > : > | >> news:1163057403.416466.230930@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... : > : > | >>> Pete Rynas wrote: : > : > | >>>> i have had nothing but trouble with this board!! anyone else??? : > : > | >>> : > : > | >>> : > : > | >>> I've had two PT800CE boards, one of which I sold separately and : > : > the : > : > | >>> other part of a system. They didn't like 1GB memory modules I : > : > tried : > : > | >>> and seemed to be flakey with ATI R9600 AGP cards that worked : > : > perfectly : > : > | >>> in other motherboards. Otherwise, they ran just fine with 512MB : > : > | >>> modules, ATI Radeon 8500, and Radeon 9250. : > : > | >>> : > : > | >>> Regards, : > : > | >>> : > : > | >>> Tim : > : > | >>> : > : > | >> : > : > | >> : > : > | > : > : > | > : > : > | : > : > | : > : > : > : > |
| | Back to top | |  | |
|